17.01.01.04_v0065-s0001-n0012-p0003

Publication Volume Number Page
Northern Iowan 65 12 3
Archival Scanned Page with Text
Page 3

All Pages in this Issue

Archival Scanned Page with Text
Page 1
Archival Scanned Page with Text
Page 2
Archival Scanned Page with Text
Page 3
Archival Scanned Page with Text
Page 4
Archival Scanned Page with Text
Page 5
Archival Scanned Page with Text
Page 6
Archival Scanned Page with Text
Page 7
Archival Scanned Page with Text
Page 8
Archival Scanned Page with Text
Page 9
Archival Scanned Page with Text
Page 10
Archival Scanned Page with Text
Page 11
Archival Scanned Page with Text
Page 12
Archival Scanned Page with Text
Page 13
Archival Scanned Page with Text
Page 14
Archival Scanned Page with Text
Page 15
Archival Scanned Page with Text
Page 16
Archival Scanned Page with Text
Page 17
Archival Scanned Page with Text
Page 18
Archival Scanned Page with Text
Page 19
Archival Scanned Page with Text
Page 20
Archival Scanned Page with Text
Page 21
Archival Scanned Page with Text
Page 22
Archival Scanned Page with Text
Page 23
Archival Scanned Page with Text
Page 24
Archival Scanned Page with Text
Page 25
Archival Scanned Page with Text
Page 26
Archival Scanned Page with Text
Page 27
Archival Scanned Page with Text
Page 28
Title Article Summary
'Dr. Fox argued wrongly against them' Letter attempts to show that Professor Fox used improper reasoning and bad logic to defend his objections to Black history and Black literature courses in his 10/11/68 letter.
'Dr. Fox has selective view of literature' Letter attempts to show that Professor Fox is mistaken in his claim that Black literature is not significant enough to be studied as a separate genre.