| Publication | Volume | Number | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| College Eye | 63 | 25 | 2 |
Page 2
All Pages in this Issue
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
| Title | Article Summary |
|---|---|
| Students should help determine the academic calendar | Calls for greater student input into the calendar process |
| Miss Glanz refutes challengers | Accepts debate proposal from a previous letter. |
| Miss Voigt corrects ambiguity | Clarifies voting requirements for student constitutional amendments. |
| Proposes Bartlett pillory | Pokes fun at the new penalty policies in women's dorms. |
| Parker's proposal insufficient | Asks for greater specificity with regard to Professor Parker's "orientation" plan. |
| Apology to Dr. Dohrman | Claims he went over the line in last week's column; apologizes for the misunderstanding it created. |
| Faculty evaluation promises instant dope | Discusses the possible value of student evaluations of professors. |