Faculty Evaluation

Displaying 51 - 100 of 127 in reverse chronological order
# Title Date Summary
51 New evaluations to help, says V. P. Martin
Northern Iowan 74:22, p.1
Provost Martin wrote first draft; will be used before the end of November.
52 Are faculty evaluations an indignity? NO
Northern Iowan 74:21, p.2
Professor Chang welcomes what he will learn from evaluation.
53 Sidewalk, constitution, KCRS discussed by UNISA Senate at last meeting
Northern Iowan 74:20, p.1
54 Get rich quick?
Northern Iowan 74:19, p.2
Professor Schwartz talks about the effects of collective bargaining on her paycheck; urges students to take faculty evaluation seriously.
55 New form of faculty evaluation
Northern Iowan 74:17, p.5
Description of new form.
56 UNISA working to grade the faculty by ABC's
Northern Iowan 74:12, p.3
Administration approves structure of faculty evaluation.
57 New method of faculty evaluation proposed
Northern Iowan 74:9, p.8
Scott Beckman explains his proposal.
58 Special UNISA session needed on general ed
Northern Iowan 74:8, p.6
Also considering faculty evaluation; appointments announced.
59 Adm. evaluation set this spring
Northern Iowan 73:15, p.1
New evaluation instruments for dean and department head approved.
60 UNISA discusses Regents, calendar, faculty evaluation
Northern Iowan 69:19, p.1
61 Faculty evaluation revised
Northern Iowan 69:19, p.7
Revised edition available.
62 Faculty evaluation to be conducted
Northern Iowan 68:48, p.7
Scheduling evaluation times now.
63 Evaluation and improvement of instruction
Northern Iowan 68:46, p.2
Professor Fox has no illusions that a plan currently under consideration will improve the quality of instruction.
64 UNISA unveils new faculty evaluation
Northern Iowan 68:26, p.1
Description of new instrument.
65 Behind the scenes
UNI Quarterly 2:4, p.5
Collection of brief articles on recent events and activities on campus; photo.
66 Leonard thanks people involved
Northern Iowan 67:55, p.2
Grateful to those who helped with faculty evaluation.
67 Professor chides faculty evaluation.
Northern Iowan 67:54, p.3
Professor Hoff cites problems with evaluation.
68 Faculty evaluation swings into action tomorrow
Northern Iowan 67:50, p.11
Prepared to administer instrument.
69 Faculty evaluation: "a misnomer"?
Northern Iowan 67:50, p.1
Reporter questions just exactly what the evaluations are.
70 Faculty evaluation workers needed
Northern Iowan 67:49, p.1
Need more students to administer instrument.
71 Complete faculty evaluation for UNI: the first
Northern Iowan 67:48, p.1

History of evaluation development; plans for administration of instrument.

72 Faculty evaluation format drawn
Northern Iowan 67:46, p.1
Plans for administration of form.
73 Evaluation assistance
Northern Iowan 67:43, p.2
Asks for help in administering faculty evaluation forms.
74 Patton explains faculty evaluation; instrument finally released
Northern Iowan 67:42, p.6
Detailed look at background and objectives of instrument; photo.
75 Considerate evaluation
Northern Iowan 67:24, p.2
Believes that evaluation of teaching should allow for creative methods.
76 Faculty evaluation begins study
Northern Iowan 67:15, p.4
Committee will review faculty evaluation procedures.
77 Dean Lang's speech at Chicago meeting
Public Relations News Release 1969:472, p.1
Dean Lang presented "Faculty Evaluation Procedures at the University of Northern Iowa" at the meeting; summary
78 Faculty evaluation is student responsibility
Northern Iowan 66:36, p.4
Mike Conlee proposes a faculty evaluation and points out his recommendation for carrying it out.
79 Professor evaluation poll results to be announced
Northern Iowan 65:30, p.1
Will reflect limited response to survey.
80 Student Senate to compile prof ratings
Northern Iowan 65:7, p.4
Student Senate Committee on Faculty Relations hopes to produce booklet of faculty evaluations in time for spring preregistration, based on questionnaires filed by students last spring.
81 7000 responses expected for prof evaluation survey
Northern Iowan 64:53, p.4
Evaluations carried out this week; data will be tabulated.
82 'Grade the Prof' polling begins Monday
Northern Iowan 64:51, p.1
General results may be made public.
83 Not a 'witch hunt'
Northern Iowan 64:48, p.2
Defends idea of evaluation of faculty by students.
84 Prof evaluation survey gets Student Senate funds
Northern Iowan 64:47, p.4
85 'Talk is cheap'
Northern Iowan 64:43, p.3
Encourages students to contribute to the faculty evaluation effort.
86 Teacher evaluation survey
Northern Iowan 64:41, p.4
Outlines aims of survey.
87 Faculty evaluations
Northern Iowan 64:41, p.5
Supports effort to evaluate faculty.
88 Postpone prof evaluation, Iowan withdraws support
Northern Iowan 64:41, p.1
Will require more time to get organized.
89 Student-Faculty Senates discuss, grades, evaluation
College Eye 63:56, p.5
90 Should we forget evaluation?
College Eye 63:39, p.4
Laments the lack of participation in the independent survey.
91 Faculty evaluation discussed by students, faculty members
College Eye 63:31, p.1
Students speak at AAUP meeting.
92 Supports student evaluation
College Eye 63:27, p.2
Satirizes the faculty evaluation form.
93 Richter questions Childers
College Eye 63:26, p.3
Questions the validity of the study being done on faculty evaluation.
94 Faculty evaluation promises instant dope
College Eye 63:25, p.2
Discusses the possible value of student evaluations of professors.
95 Hot dope on faculty evaluation
College Eye 63:23, p.3
Gives the results of survey questions for a faculty evaluation.
96 Dean Lang misunderstood Childers
College Eye 63:23, p.3
Responds to a recent meeting about faculty evaluations.
97 Childers recollections different
College Eye 63:23, p.3
Responds to a Letter written by Dr. Lang about faculty evaluations.
98 Instructor evaluation coming
College Eye 63:19, p.2
Reports that a committee has the approval of Dean Lang to proceed with instructor evaluations.
99 Where is faculty evaluation?
College Eye 63:17, p.2
Believes that faculty evaluations would be a good idea.
100 Should students be allowed to rate their professors?
College Eye 60:65, p.2
Professor Howard expresses his opinion.